Guide
Rolling Basis vs. Parclio.
Last updated September 2026 · Parclio facts checked directly against getparclio.com
Both tools estimate what a commercial property’s tax bill becomes after a reassessment-triggering event and translate that into NOI/DSCR impact for underwriting. The real differences are in scope (which property types and jurisdictions), workflow (what you feed the tool), and how you pay for it. We’re not neutral here — we built Rolling Basis — but every figure about Parclio below is sourced directly from their public site, not secondhand, and we’ve tried to be straight about where they’re the better fit.
At a glance
| Rolling Basis | Parclio | |
|---|---|---|
| Property types | Office, retail, multifamily, industrial, hotel | Multifamily and HUD/Agency-focused |
| Jurisdiction coverage | 100+ counties, 32+ states | 75 jurisdictions, 22 states |
| Input method | Address + purchase price, typed directly | Upload a tax bill, T12, rent roll, or OM — AI extracts the figures for you to confirm |
| One-time purchase, no account | Yes — $39/report ($19 launch price) | No — subscription only after 3 free lifetime estimates |
| Unlimited-usage subscription | $29/mo, ~20 reports/mo cap | $49/mo Pro, unlimited estimates |
| Multi-year tax trajectory forecast | Yes, 5-year, where the jurisdiction’s cap compounds annually | Not published in their methodology as of this writing |
| LIHTC-restricted valuation flagging | Automatic, matched against HUD’s public LIHTC database | Explicitly out of scope — their methodology lists LIHTC exemptions as not modeled |
| TIF district awareness | Flagged for Texas TIRZ districts | Not mentioned in their published scope |
| Debt yield / tax-per-unit metrics | Not currently a published output | Yes — debt yield, tax per unit, breakeven rent impact |
| Document extraction (Deal Analyzer) | Not offered — no document upload step | Yes, AI-assisted extraction from uploaded documents |
| Conversational AI on your deal | Not offered | Yes — “Ask Parclio,” capped by plan tier |
Parclio figures from getparclio.com and getparclio.com/pricing and getparclio.com/methodology, checked directly. Pricing and coverage numbers change; verify current figures on their site before relying on this comparison.
Where Parclio is the better choice
If your deal flow is multifamily or HUD/Agency-heavy, Parclio’s scope is built around exactly that workflow — tax-per-unit and breakeven-rent-impact outputs, debt yield modeling, and a document-upload flow that’s genuinely convenient if you already have a T12 or rent roll on hand and don’t want to retype numbers. Their Pro tier is unlimited estimates for $49/mo, which is a better per-report cost than Rolling Basis Pro’s ~20/mo cap if you’re running more than about 20 reports a month. Their “Ask Parclio” assistant and portfolio dashboard are also things Rolling Basis doesn’t currently offer.
Where Rolling Basis is the better choice
If you need a single defensible number for one deal and don’t want to commit to a subscription, Rolling Basis’s $39 (or $19 launch) one-time report has no account requirement at all. If your pipeline spans property types beyond multifamily — office, retail, industrial, hotel — Rolling Basis is built for that breadth rather than a single vertical. And if a deal touches LIHTC-restricted rents or a Texas TIRZ district, or you need to see the tax bill’s trajectory past year one rather than just the immediate reset, those are built into Rolling Basis today.